Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Á¢Âø¹æ¹ý ¹× multistranded wireÀÇ Á¾·ù¿¡ µû¸¥ Á¢Âø½Ä º¸Á¤ÀåÄ¡ÀÇ Àü´ÜÁ¢Âø°­µµ¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸

A study of shear bond strength of bonded retainer according »õ™“ bonding method and type of wires

Korean Journal of Orthodontics 2002³â 32±Ç 2È£ p.143 ~ 153
ÀÌÇüö, ¼ÕÈ«ÁÖ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÌÇüö (  ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±³Á¤Çб³½Ç
¼ÕÈ«ÁÖ (  ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±³Á¤Çб³½Ç

Abstract


The bonded orthodontic retainer constructed from composite and multistrand orthodontic wire provides an esthetic and efficient system for maintained retention. This study was designed to measure shear bond strength of bonded retainers and to suggest a optimal combination of a multistrand wire and bonding method used when bonded retainer was fabricated. 160 sound maxillary and mandibular premolars were used for 80 test samples. After Uniformizing bonding area, length of wire, and thickness of composite, multistrand wire was bonded to fabricated a bonded retainer by direct or indirect bonding method. Shear bond strength and extension length of each ample were measured by a universal testing machine.

The results of this study were as follows

1. In vitro shear bond testing found 6-stranded, 0.0155 inch wires to have the largest shear bond strength and 3-stranded, 0.0195 inch wires to have the least shear bond strength. But, These difference was not statistically significant(p<0.05).
2. In vitro extension testing found 3-stranded, 0.0155 inch wires to have the largest extension length and 3-stranded, 0.0195 inch wires to have the least extension length(p<0_05). The larger diameter wire was used, the larger extension length was shown. But, the strand of wire is not related to the extension length of wire.
3. In comparison with direct bonding method, larger shear bond strength and extension length was shown in indirect bonding method(p<0.05).

Å°¿öµå

Á¢Âø½Ä º¸Á¤ÀåÄ¡;°­¼±ÀÇ Á¾·ù;Á¢Âø¹æ¹ý;Á¢Âø°­µµ;Bonded retainer;Type of wires;Bonding method;Bond strength

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

SCI(E)
KCI
KoreaMed